Sunday, 27 March 2016
Thursday, 17 March 2016
Friday, 12 February 2016
Thursday, 12 November 2015
When will mr rat get it?
+88rat88
*Oh dear Spanky, are you confusing delusion with illusion?*
Oh Mr Rat... It seems like I am the only one bringing evidences to the table. Here are dictionary evidences for you
_delusion_
_2. the state of being deluded._ (1)
Let me add the definition of "delude" because I am starting to doubt that english language is your first language
_delude_
_1. to mislead the mind or judgment of; deceive:_ (3)
do you see the word "deceive" there? good.
_Illusion_
_2. the state or condition of being deceived; misapprehension._ (2)
Do you see the word deceive there too again? Good. It seems like you do not know what a "synonymn" is. Both of them mean the same thing. Mr Evidenceless.
*Are you resorting to baseless accusations now? I have never deleted anybody's posts.*
Again ... Mr Rat does not know how to follow an argument. - facepalm - Let me help you since you are so poor and helpless. That was a guilt by association fallacy. Happy Now? Even if I defeated myself. But it was meant as an insult since the only language you understand is insultive languages Mr Rat. In the congtext of talking to +Rolo Beorn , I included you because you support him and his actions. If not, tell me that you do not support him and his actions in deleting my replies.
Secondly is that the only arguement in that context you are going to respond to?
How about show your delusion on how you said:
_"Nobody is deleting your posts Sport."_
Oh please defend that one. You know what they say. "Silence is be best answer for the defeated".
*Even if I wanted to, I couldn't. I am neither an administrator nor the creator of this video so how could I? The most I could do is flag a comment as spam, but even then it takes multiple flags to get a comment removed. And I can assure you I never flagged any of your comments.*
Good then you agree with me that you have no authoritative right to say:
_"Nobody is deleting your posts Sport."_
Wow... you CAN be wise from time to time by admitting correction.
*Nope. I stopped talking to imaginary friends when I was still a child. It's high time you did too ;)*
oK ... Good. But you are making the assumption that God is imaginary. Please lay your syllogism and let us see. If not, that is a baseless/ blanket assertion and argumentum ad lapidem.
The reason I pray to God is NOT because HE is imaginary ... thanks for demontrating your ignorance over the christian position. The christian argues that if God, a necessarily maximally great being, exists, we did not imagine HIM, *HE IMAGINED US* ... Oh God, how long do I have to deal with this ignorant rat?
*And you know this how?*
Please ... notice the first word in that sentence ... *seems*
Here is a dictionary definition to educate yourself on some english language:
_Seem_ (4)
_to appear to be true, probable, or evident:_
_It seems likely to rain._
Let me simply answer it: I don't "know" if this is true. It "appears" to be true due to the contextual data I am receiving from the probability of our discussion and I am laying it down as good evidence to theorise/ believe/ suspect.
*Not vile Spanky. I said virile. Can you not see the extra two letters there? Virile is defined as having strength or energy. In other words, the exact opposite of your arguments. The point of the analogy was to illustrate that your arguments are impotent.*
Oh ... ok... now I see. Let me step back and re-iterate myself. Sorry for that, my eyes were so filled with hate and maddness that I could not see your arguements properly.
*Your so called "arguments" are about as virile (and arrogant) as a flea who, after sexually attacking an elephant says, "Did I hurt you baby?"*
That argument makes no sense now... please... explain this if not this a Fallacy of False Analogy.
*Funny how you admit you don't know me, and yet you presume to know that I "can never accomplish anything good in my life". Contradictory much?*
Not contradictory much .... it is "no-english much" I said it "seems". ayaya ...
*At least my conclusions about you are based on things that you yourself have stated. For example, your demonstrable lack of understanding of what science is. I'm perfectly justified in making those conclusions when, by your own words, you hand me the rope with which to hang you.*
Really? You mean the ones where you show how you jumped the gun? You mean the one where you didn't wait to hear the arguments before making conclusions? Yeah ... less than _things I stated_ and more like _things you IMAGINED I stated. Here's a piece of advise for you... next time when you see
_BE PATIENT I'M STILL EDITING THIS AND THE ABOVE ARGUMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE_
in an argument ... maybe you would shut up, keep quiet, be actually patient and wait to see what I have ACTUALLY have to say. That example, MR RAT was actually concrete and the best analogy you've given in the whole of this discussion to back up your very strong arguments - NOT! - Sarcarsm.
*Sure, in exactly the same way that your god is pointless to me.*
So why were you guys (your association) actually aggitated and angry and insulting me over something so pointless. It seems to me that "God is not so pointless actually"... HE makes you react in this objective real world hahahaha.
*See how that works Sport? When you understand why you dismiss the 30,000+ other gods that people worship, you'lll understand why atheists go that one tiny step farther by also dismissing yours. You'll also understand the absurdity of believing that you somehow won the lottery by being born into a culture that just happened to indoctrinate you with the one "true" god out of many, many thousands.*
please read here http://www.gotquestions.org/correct-religion.html
This stupid statement you have made has been answered OVER AND OVER AGAIN ... to show you why Intelligent Adults still believe in the God of the Bible - a maximally, necessary great being.
Thanks for demonstrating your ignorance of the Christian Position. I could re-explain this to you but you are too ignorant to understand how ignorant you are mr Rat.
Have a Blessed day
God bless you
REFERENCES
(1) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/delusion?s=t
(2) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/illusion
(3) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/delude
(4) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/seem?s=t
Mr Rat Won't Give Up - ayaya
Oh dear Spanky, are you confusing delusion with illusion?
Oh Mr Rat... It seems like I am the only one bringing evidences to the table. Here are dictionary evidences for you
delusion
2. the state of being deluded. (1)
Let me add the definition of "delude" because I am starting to doubt that english language is your first language
delude
1. to mislead the mind or judgment of; deceive: (3)
do you see the word "deceive" there? good.
Illusion
2. the state or condition of being deceived; misapprehension. (2)
Do you see the word deceive there too again? Good. It seems like you do not know what a "synonymn" is. Both of them mean the same thing. Mr Evidenceless.
Are you resorting to baseless accusations now? I have never deleted anybody's posts.
Again ... Mr Rat does not know how to follow an argument. - facepalm - Let me help you since you are so poor and helpless. That was a guilt by association fallacy. Happy Now? Even if I defeated myself. But it was meant as an insult since the only language you understand is insultive languages Mr Rat. In the congtext of talking to +Rolo Beorn , I included you because you support him and his actions. If not, tell me that you do not support him and his actions in deleting my replies.
Secondly is that the only arguement in that context you are going to respond to?
How about show your delusion on how you said:
"Nobody is deleting your posts Sport."
Oh please defend that one. You know what they say. "Silence is be best answer for the defeated".
Even if I wanted to, I couldn't. I am neither an administrator nor the creator of this video so how could I? The most I could do is flag a comment as spam, but even then it takes multiple flags to get a comment removed. And I can assure you I never flagged any of your comments.
Good then you agree with me that you have no authoritative right to say:
"Nobody is deleting your posts Sport."
Wow... you CAN be wise from time to time by admitting correction.
Nope. I stopped talking to imaginary friends when I was still a child. It's high time you did too ;)
oK ... Good. But you are making the assumption that God is imaginary. Please lay your syllogism and let us see. If not, that is a baseless/ blanket assertion and argumentum ad lapidem.
The reason I pray to God is NOT because HE is imaginary ... thanks for demontrating your ignorance over the christian position. The christian argues that if God, a necessarily maximally great being, exists, we did not imagine HIM, HE IMAGINED US ... Oh God, how long do I have to deal with this ignorant rat?
And you know this how?
Please ... notice the first word in that sentence ... seems
Here is a dictionary definition to educate yourself on some english language:
Seem (4)
to appear to be true, probable, or evident:
It seems likely to rain.
Let me simply answer it: I don't "know" if this is true. It "appears" to be true due to the contextual data I am receiving from the probability of our discussion and I am laying it down as good evidence to theorise/ believe/ suspect.
Not vile Spanky. I said virile. Can you not see the extra two letters there? Virile is defined as having strength or energy. In other words, the exact opposite of your arguments. The point of the analogy was to illustrate that your arguments are impotent.
Oh ... ok... now I see. Let me step back and re-iterate myself. Sorry for that, my eyes were so filled with hate and maddness that I could not see your arguements properly.
Your so called "arguments" are about as virile (and arrogant) as a flea who, after sexually attacking an elephant says, "Did I hurt you baby?"
That argument makes no sense now... please... explain this if not this a Fallacy of False Analogy.
Funny how you admit you don't know me, and yet you presume to know that I "can never accomplish anything good in my life". Contradictory much?
Not contradictory much .... it is "no-english much" I said it "seems". ayaya ...
At least my conclusions about you are based on things that you yourself have stated. For example, your demonstrable lack of understanding of what science is. I'm perfectly justified in making those conclusions when, by your own words, you hand me the rope with which to hang you.
Really? You mean the ones where you show how you jumped the gun? You mean the one where you didn't wait to hear the arguments before making conclusions? Yeah ... less than things I stated and more like _things you IMAGINED I stated. Here's a piece of advise for you... next time when you see
BE PATIENT I'M STILL EDITING THIS AND THE ABOVE ARGUMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE
in an argument ... maybe you would shut up, keep quiet, be actually patient and wait to see what I have ACTUALLY have to say. That example, MR RAT was actually concrete and the best analogy you've given in the whole of this discussion to back up your very strong arguments - NOT! - Sarcarsm.
Sure, in exactly the same way that your god is pointless to me.
So why were you guys (your association) actually aggitated and angry and insulting me over something so pointless. It seems to me that "God is not so pointless actually"... HE makes you react in this objective real world hahahaha.
See how that works Sport? When you understand why you dismiss the 30,000+ other gods that people worship, you'lll understand why atheists go that one tiny step farther by also dismissing yours. You'll also understand the absurdity of believing that you somehow won the lottery by being born into a culture that just happened to indoctrinate you with the one "true" god out of many, many thousands.
please read here http://www.gotquestions.org/correct-religion.html
This stupid statement you have made has been answered OVER AND OVER AGAIN ... to show you why Intelligent Adults still believe in the God of the Bible - a maximally, necessary great being.
Thanks for demonstrating your ignorance of the Christian Position. I could re-explain this to you but you are too ignorant to understand how ignorant you are mr Rat.
Have a Blessed day
God bless you
REFERENCES
(1) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/delusion?s=t
(2) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/illusion
(3) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/delude
(4) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/seem?s=t
Oh Mr Rat... It seems like I am the only one bringing evidences to the table. Here are dictionary evidences for you
delusion
2. the state of being deluded. (1)
Let me add the definition of "delude" because I am starting to doubt that english language is your first language
delude
1. to mislead the mind or judgment of; deceive: (3)
do you see the word "deceive" there? good.
Illusion
2. the state or condition of being deceived; misapprehension. (2)
Do you see the word deceive there too again? Good. It seems like you do not know what a "synonymn" is. Both of them mean the same thing. Mr Evidenceless.
Are you resorting to baseless accusations now? I have never deleted anybody's posts.
Again ... Mr Rat does not know how to follow an argument. - facepalm - Let me help you since you are so poor and helpless. That was a guilt by association fallacy. Happy Now? Even if I defeated myself. But it was meant as an insult since the only language you understand is insultive languages Mr Rat. In the congtext of talking to +Rolo Beorn , I included you because you support him and his actions. If not, tell me that you do not support him and his actions in deleting my replies.
Secondly is that the only arguement in that context you are going to respond to?
How about show your delusion on how you said:
"Nobody is deleting your posts Sport."
Oh please defend that one. You know what they say. "Silence is be best answer for the defeated".
Even if I wanted to, I couldn't. I am neither an administrator nor the creator of this video so how could I? The most I could do is flag a comment as spam, but even then it takes multiple flags to get a comment removed. And I can assure you I never flagged any of your comments.
Good then you agree with me that you have no authoritative right to say:
"Nobody is deleting your posts Sport."
Wow... you CAN be wise from time to time by admitting correction.
Nope. I stopped talking to imaginary friends when I was still a child. It's high time you did too ;)
oK ... Good. But you are making the assumption that God is imaginary. Please lay your syllogism and let us see. If not, that is a baseless/ blanket assertion and argumentum ad lapidem.
The reason I pray to God is NOT because HE is imaginary ... thanks for demontrating your ignorance over the christian position. The christian argues that if God, a necessarily maximally great being, exists, we did not imagine HIM, HE IMAGINED US ... Oh God, how long do I have to deal with this ignorant rat?
And you know this how?
Please ... notice the first word in that sentence ... seems
Here is a dictionary definition to educate yourself on some english language:
Seem (4)
to appear to be true, probable, or evident:
It seems likely to rain.
Let me simply answer it: I don't "know" if this is true. It "appears" to be true due to the contextual data I am receiving from the probability of our discussion and I am laying it down as good evidence to theorise/ believe/ suspect.
Not vile Spanky. I said virile. Can you not see the extra two letters there? Virile is defined as having strength or energy. In other words, the exact opposite of your arguments. The point of the analogy was to illustrate that your arguments are impotent.
Oh ... ok... now I see. Let me step back and re-iterate myself. Sorry for that, my eyes were so filled with hate and maddness that I could not see your arguements properly.
Your so called "arguments" are about as virile (and arrogant) as a flea who, after sexually attacking an elephant says, "Did I hurt you baby?"
That argument makes no sense now... please... explain this if not this a Fallacy of False Analogy.
Funny how you admit you don't know me, and yet you presume to know that I "can never accomplish anything good in my life". Contradictory much?
Not contradictory much .... it is "no-english much" I said it "seems". ayaya ...
At least my conclusions about you are based on things that you yourself have stated. For example, your demonstrable lack of understanding of what science is. I'm perfectly justified in making those conclusions when, by your own words, you hand me the rope with which to hang you.
Really? You mean the ones where you show how you jumped the gun? You mean the one where you didn't wait to hear the arguments before making conclusions? Yeah ... less than things I stated and more like _things you IMAGINED I stated. Here's a piece of advise for you... next time when you see
BE PATIENT I'M STILL EDITING THIS AND THE ABOVE ARGUMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE
in an argument ... maybe you would shut up, keep quiet, be actually patient and wait to see what I have ACTUALLY have to say. That example, MR RAT was actually concrete and the best analogy you've given in the whole of this discussion to back up your very strong arguments - NOT! - Sarcarsm.
Sure, in exactly the same way that your god is pointless to me.
So why were you guys (your association) actually aggitated and angry and insulting me over something so pointless. It seems to me that "God is not so pointless actually"... HE makes you react in this objective real world hahahaha.
See how that works Sport? When you understand why you dismiss the 30,000+ other gods that people worship, you'lll understand why atheists go that one tiny step farther by also dismissing yours. You'll also understand the absurdity of believing that you somehow won the lottery by being born into a culture that just happened to indoctrinate you with the one "true" god out of many, many thousands.
please read here http://www.gotquestions.org/correct-religion.html
This stupid statement you have made has been answered OVER AND OVER AGAIN ... to show you why Intelligent Adults still believe in the God of the Bible - a maximally, necessary great being.
Thanks for demonstrating your ignorance of the Christian Position. I could re-explain this to you but you are too ignorant to understand how ignorant you are mr Rat.
Have a Blessed day
God bless you
REFERENCES
(1) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/delusion?s=t
(2) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/illusion
(3) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/delude
(4) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/seem?s=t
Someone Can't find his way around an argument
oh Jesus have mercy! I'm going to have to be harsh with you.
*Your 'arguments' are without a foundation, as you have already admitted that you can't provide proof for the existence of your god.
You can't build an argument on mere thin air.*
*1 QUESTION*: Can you *prove* that you are not a brain in a vat, and that this reality (digested food in your stomach, people around you, your age) is not all fake and programmed into your brain like in the matrix?
I am not asking for *evidence*, I want *proof*. Read your dictionary and know the difference between proof and evidence. Please prove it to me to 100% degree of certainty. If not, your reference called "reality" is just on thin air too.
*I do this for a good reason.*
*You have NOT provided ANY evidence for the existence of your particular god, among the many thousands of other MAN MADE gods.*
Oh so now you want evidence and not proof? Ok... here are some philosophical evidences:
- The Cosmological Argument
- The Moral Arguement
- The ontological Argument
- The teleological argument
Which one of them due don you think is false on grounds of objective logic? WHY?
*It seems to YOU that your god exists, but you DON'T have ANY proof for it whatsoever.*
Now you want proof? MAKE UP YOUR MIND? DO YOU WANT PROOF OR EVIDENCE. If you want proof, go away, I have not proof as I have told you. If you want evidence ... tell me which philosophical evidence in the above arguments you do not believe in.
If you don't answer anything else, answer the part where I said *"1 QUESTION"* ... Thank you
God bless you
oh Jesus have mercy! I'm going to have to be harsh with you.
*Your 'arguments' are without a foundation, as you have already admitted that you can't provide proof for the existence of your god.
You can't build an argument on mere thin air.*
*1 QUESTION*: Can you *prove* that you are not a brain in a vat, and that this reality (digested food in your stomach, people around you, your age) is not all fake and programmed into your brain like in the matrix?
I am not asking for *evidence*, I want *proof*. Read your dictionary and know the difference between proof and evidence. Please prove it to me to 100% degree of certainty. If not, your reference called "reality" is just on thin air too.
*I do this for a good reason.*
*You have NOT provided ANY evidence for the existence of your particular god, among the many thousands of other MAN MADE gods.*
Oh so now you want evidence and not proof? Ok... here are some philosophical evidences:
- The Cosmological Argument
- The Moral Arguement
- The ontological Argument
- The teleological argument
Which one of them due don you think is false on grounds of objective logic? WHY?
*It seems to YOU that your god exists, but you DON'T have ANY proof for it whatsoever.*
Now you want proof? MAKE UP YOUR MIND? DO YOU WANT PROOF OR EVIDENCE. If you want proof, go away, I have not proof as I have told you. If you want evidence ... tell me which philosophical evidence in the above arguments you do not believe in.
If you don't answer anything else, answer the part where I said *"1 QUESTION"* ... Thank you
God bless you
Mr Rat is on fire
+88rat88
Hey Mr RAT. Seem... I do not get in what context the delusion runs deep with me, if not, shouldn't you be worrying that you are talking to a delusion right now and go see your psychologists? So, in what way does the delusion run deep? In my person or in this discussion context? If not... that bland, generalising statement holds no justifiable grounds.
*Nobody is deleting your posts Sport.*
Oh you want to tell me that one more time wheb +Rolo Beorn actually said and I quote:
_"I might have deleted a comment that was too ludicrous and pointless."_
_"Dog bless you"_
Please look at it one more time and tell me that nobody is deleting my comments. If I do not trust you guys anymore, don't blame me... you started it by insulting me by deleting my arguments so... say it one more time and show eveyone who really has the delusions.
Secondly, you are not a proper authority to appeal to, to make that assertion. If +Rolo Beorn or the video creator or YouTube Administration said so... I would believe. So... Mr Rat is assuming authoritative roles that he isn't even supposed to be positioned in. I wonder where the delusions really run deep.
*This is a known problem with YouTube ever since they made changes. I cannot see my own posts in the comment section either. But if you look in the notification side pane (under the little bell), the entire conversation thread is there, unaltered.*
Oh is that so? Why didnt you just say that? Oh I forgot that you are MR RAT and MR TROLL and you don't know what thety call "The Art of Civilised Discussion". Even when you wanna do good things to people you must always add a piece of badness to it. Have you prayed to God to remove this curse from you? Seems like you can never accomplish anything good in your life!
*Your so called "arguments" are about as virile (and arrogant) as a flea who, after sexually attacking an elephant says, "Did I hurt you baby?"*
Wow! You are calling my arguments vile by resorting to vile innuendos. Your hypocricrisy and disingenuity is noted. This is the best example you could come up with? Thanks for showing us how vile your own arguments too really is.
Secondly, you are coming to this conclusion based on imaginary arguments that are not even here - I wonder where the delusion actually runs deep. Please... show us this argments that are so vile and arrogant. Oh? No where?... ayaya ...
*Keep stroking your ego by thinking you have pearls of wisdom to cast.*
Category Mistake between
1. Ego and
2. Pearls of Wisdom
Study the definition of Category mistake. Ego or no-ego ... it does not necessitate the objective logic of "pearls of wisdom." Please... put away your appeal to emotions... we are trying to have a logical discussion here.
*The rest of us will continue to regard you for what you are: the court jester (a.k.a. fool).*
You do not know me and I do not know you. I wonder who the delusional one is. Tell me more about myself that I don't know ... come on... since you like enjoying your delusion fantasy as to who your wishful thinking wants me to be. Tell me more and show us all who the delusional one is Mr RAT.
*Odin bless you (glad as hell I'm not you)*
Odin is pointless to me. And ok... ok? ...ok ... you are free to be glad you are not me... I dont see the point there. You are you and I am me... so? - still looking for the logic in that statement - .
God bless you (glad as "heaven" that I am not you)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)